Re: [Patch, fortran] PR87477 - [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

[Mikael Morin <morin-mikael@orange.fr>]

Le 01/06/2023 à 17:20, Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran a écrit :
> Hi All,
> 
> This started out as the search for a fix to pr109948 and evolved to roll in
> 5 other prs.
> 
> Basically parse_associate was far too clunky and, in anycase, existing
> functions in resolve.cc were well capable of doing the determination of the
> target expression rank. While I was checking the comments, the lightbulb
> flashed with respect to prs 102109/112/190 and the chunk dealing with
> function results of unknown type was born.
> 
> Thanks to the changes in parse.cc, the problem in pr99326 migrated
> upstream to the resolution and the chunklet in resolve.cc was an obvious
> fix.
> 
> I am minded to s/{ dg-do run}/{ dg-do compile } for all six testcases.
Makes sense, the PRs were bogus errors and ICEs, so all compile time issues.

> At
> the testing stage, I wanted to check that the testcases actually did what
> they are supposed to do :-)
> 
> Bootstraps and regtests OK - good for head?
> 
OK.  Thanks for this.

> Paul
> 
> PS I need to do some housekeeping on pr87477 now. Some of the blockers have
> "fixed themselves" and others are awaiting backporting. I think that there
> are only 4 or so left, of which 89645 and 99065 are the most difficult to
> deal with.