From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 96962 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2015 20:00:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 96129 invoked by uid 89); 1 Dec 2015 20:00:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 20:00:37 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id tB1K0YQQ023733 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:00:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id tB1K0Y0U023732; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:00:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 20:00:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: David Malcolm Cc: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer , gfortran , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: Use Levenshtein spelling suggestions in Fortran FE Message-ID: <20151201200034.GB22678@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <1448974501-30981-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <1448974501-30981-4-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <1448990880.8490.24.camel@surprise> <1448992708.8490.29.camel@surprise> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1448992708.8490.29.camel@surprise> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:58:28PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 18:51 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > As said, we could as well use a list of candidates with NULL as record marker. > > Implementation cosmetics. Steve seems to not be thrilled by the > > overall idea in the first place, so unless there is clear support by > > somebody else i won't pursue this any further, it's not that i'm bored > > or ran out of stuff i should do.. ;) > > (FWIW I liked the idea, but I'm not a Fortran person so my opinion > counts much less that Steve's) > Your opinion is as valid as mine. My only concern is code maintenance. Injection of C++ (or any other language) into C code seems to add possible complications when something needs to be fix or changed to accommodate a new Fortran freature. -- Steve