* goacc/reduction-2.f95 failure
@ 2015-12-02 20:33 Steve Kargl
2015-12-02 20:42 ` Cesar Philippidis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kargl @ 2015-12-02 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cesar, thomas; +Cc: fortran
Cesar, Thomas,
I just got a failure in the gfortran testsuite.
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/reduction-2.f95 -O scan-tree-dump-times \
gimple "target oacc_kernels map.tofrom:a .len: 4.." 1
Is this a known failure or expected?
reduction-2.f95 was committed yesterday. Is something missing?
--
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: goacc/reduction-2.f95 failure
2015-12-02 20:33 goacc/reduction-2.f95 failure Steve Kargl
@ 2015-12-02 20:42 ` Cesar Philippidis
2015-12-02 20:49 ` Steve Kargl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cesar Philippidis @ 2015-12-02 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Kargl, thomas; +Cc: fortran
On 12/02/2015 12:33 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I just got a failure in the gfortran testsuite.
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/reduction-2.f95 -O scan-tree-dump-times \
> gimple "target oacc_kernels map.tofrom:a .len: 4.." 1
>
> Is this a known failure or expected?
>
> reduction-2.f95 was committed yesterday. Is something missing?
How old is your build?
I think Tom tweaked the default data mapping for kernels variables
yesterday either right before or after I committed a patch which
introduced that test case. That should be fixed in this patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00349.html
which applied I applied to trunk about an hour ago.
Cesar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: goacc/reduction-2.f95 failure
2015-12-02 20:42 ` Cesar Philippidis
@ 2015-12-02 20:49 ` Steve Kargl
2015-12-02 21:44 ` Steve Kargl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kargl @ 2015-12-02 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cesar Philippidis; +Cc: thomas, fortran
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:42:40PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 12/02/2015 12:33 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > I just got a failure in the gfortran testsuite.
> >
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/reduction-2.f95 -O scan-tree-dump-times \
> > gimple "target oacc_kernels map.tofrom:a .len: 4.." 1
> >
> > Is this a known failure or expected?
> >
> > reduction-2.f95 was committed yesterday. Is something missing?
>
> How old is your build?
>
> I think Tom tweaked the default data mapping for kernels variables
> yesterday either right before or after I committed a patch which
> introduced that test case. That should be fixed in this patch
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00349.html
>
> which applied I applied to trunk about an hour ago.
>
It's about an hour old. I was testing the coarray events patch.
In preparation for the commit, I updated the gcc/testsuite directory
to get an up-to-date ChangeLog. I probably picked up a part of
a commit. Rebuild from a top-of-tree as of 10 minutes ago. I know
shortly if it is a false alarm.
--
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: goacc/reduction-2.f95 failure
2015-12-02 20:49 ` Steve Kargl
@ 2015-12-02 21:44 ` Steve Kargl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kargl @ 2015-12-02 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cesar Philippidis; +Cc: thomas, fortran
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:49:24PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:42:40PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> > On 12/02/2015 12:33 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > > I just got a failure in the gfortran testsuite.
> > >
> > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/reduction-2.f95 -O scan-tree-dump-times \
> > > gimple "target oacc_kernels map.tofrom:a .len: 4.." 1
> > >
> > > Is this a known failure or expected?
> > >
> > > reduction-2.f95 was committed yesterday. Is something missing?
> >
> > How old is your build?
> >
> > I think Tom tweaked the default data mapping for kernels variables
> > yesterday either right before or after I committed a patch which
> > introduced that test case. That should be fixed in this patch
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00349.html
> >
> > which applied I applied to trunk about an hour ago.
> >
>
> It's about an hour old. I was testing the coarray events patch.
> In preparation for the commit, I updated the gcc/testsuite directory
> to get an up-to-date ChangeLog. I probably picked up a part of
> a commit. Rebuild from a top-of-tree as of 10 minutes ago. I know
> shortly if it is a false alarm.
Following up: it appears I had an inconsistent tree, so yes, a false alarm.
--
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-02 21:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-02 20:33 goacc/reduction-2.f95 failure Steve Kargl
2015-12-02 20:42 ` Cesar Philippidis
2015-12-02 20:49 ` Steve Kargl
2015-12-02 21:44 ` Steve Kargl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).