Hi Jerry,

thanks for the kind review. Committed to trunk as r238002. I will wait
one week before applying to gcc-6/5.

Thanks again,
	Andre

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 09:01:07 -0700
Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@charter.net> wrote:

> On 07/04/2016 04:49 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> > Ping!
> >
> > Additionally did I get the time to check the patch for gcc-6 and
> > -5. It applies cleanly to both and has no regressions. Ok for trunk
> > and with one week delay for gcc-6 and -5?
> >  
> 
> 
>   OK, OK and OK! Thanks for your work.
> 
> Jerry
> 
> > - Andre
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 18:43:27 +0200
> > Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> >  
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> the attached patch fixes the regression at least for trunk (I
> >> haven't checked the others, but for 6 it should do either, 5 may
> >> need a little bit more work). The issue here is that computing the
> >> typespec involved code in se.pre that was not merged to the parent
> >> block.
> >>
> >> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu/F23? Ok for trunk?
> >>
> >> I promise to do a backport to gcc-6 and -5 next week, once this
> >> patch has been lifing in trunk a few days.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> 	Andre  
> >
> >  
> 


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de