Hi all,

backported to

gcc-6-branch as r238304, and
gcc-5-branch as r238308.

Thanks again for the review.

Regards,
	Andre

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:07:45 +0200
Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi Jerry,
> 
> thanks for the kind review. Committed to trunk as r238002. I will wait
> one week before applying to gcc-6/5.
> 
> Thanks again,
> 	Andre
> 
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 09:01:07 -0700
> Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@charter.net> wrote:
> 
> > On 07/04/2016 04:49 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:  
> > > Ping!
> > >
> > > Additionally did I get the time to check the patch for gcc-6 and
> > > -5. It applies cleanly to both and has no regressions. Ok for
> > > trunk and with one week delay for gcc-6 and -5?
> > >    
> > 
> > 
> >   OK, OK and OK! Thanks for your work.
> > 
> > Jerry
> >   
> > > - Andre
> > >
> > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 18:43:27 +0200
> > > Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> > >    
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> the attached patch fixes the regression at least for trunk (I
> > >> haven't checked the others, but for 6 it should do either, 5 may
> > >> need a little bit more work). The issue here is that computing
> > >> the typespec involved code in se.pre that was not merged to the
> > >> parent block.
> > >>
> > >> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu/F23? Ok for trunk?
> > >>
> > >> I promise to do a backport to gcc-6 and -5 next week, once this
> > >> patch has been lifing in trunk a few days.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> 	Andre    
> > >
> > >    
> >   
> 
> 


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de