public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de>
To: Mikael Morin <morin-mikael@orange.fr>
Cc: Alessandro Fanfarillo <fanfarillo.gcc@gmail.com>,
	gfortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>,
	Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
Subject: Re: [Fortran, Patch] First patch for coarray FAILED IMAGES (TS 18508)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160720113913.24e1f404@vepi2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7fe21ba-bd71-90e8-e1ef-624dea6bbf02@orange.fr>

Hi Mikael,


> > +  if(st == ST_FAIL_IMAGE)
> > +    new_st.op = EXEC_FAIL_IMAGE;
> > +  else
> > +    gcc_unreachable();  
> You can use
> 	gcc_assert (st == ST_FAIL_IMAGE);
> 	foo...;
> instead of
> 	if (st == ST_FAIL_IMAGE)
> 		foo...;
> 	else
> 		gcc_unreachable ();

Be careful, this is not 100% identical in the general case. For older
gcc version (gcc < 4008) gcc_assert() is mapped to nothing, esp. not to
an abort(), so the behavior can change. But in this case everything is
fine, because the patch is most likely not backported.

> > +
> > +  return MATCH_YES;
> > +
> > + syntax:
> > +  gfc_syntax_error (st);
> > +
> > +  return MATCH_ERROR;
> > +}
> > +
> > +match
> > +gfc_match_fail_image (void)
> > +{
> > +  /* if (!gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2008_TS, "FAIL IMAGE statement
> > at %C")) */
> > +  /*   return MATCH_ERROR; */
> > +  
> Can this be uncommented?
> 
> > +  return fail_image_statement (ST_FAIL_IMAGE);
> > +}
> >
> >  /* Match LOCK/UNLOCK statement. Syntax:
> >       LOCK ( lock-variable [ , lock-stat-list ] )
> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
> > b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c index 1aaf4e2..b2f5596 100644
> > --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
> > +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
> > @@ -1647,6 +1647,24 @@ trans_this_image (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr
> > *expr) m, lbound));
> >  }
> >
> > +static void
> > +gfc_conv_intrinsic_image_status (gfc_se *se, gfc_expr *expr)
> > +{
> > +  unsigned int num_args;
> > +  tree *args,tmp;
> > +
> > +  num_args = gfc_intrinsic_argument_list_length (expr);
> > +  args = XALLOCAVEC (tree, num_args);
> > +
> > +  gfc_conv_intrinsic_function_args (se, expr, args, num_args);
> > +
> > +  if (flag_coarray == GFC_FCOARRAY_LIB)
> > +    {  
> Can everything be put under the if?
> Does it work with -fcoarray=single?

IMO coarray=single should not generate code here, therefore putting
everything under the if should to fine.

Sorry for the comments ...

- Andre
-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-20  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-06 21:05 Alessandro Fanfarillo
2016-06-21 16:59 ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
2016-07-04 22:46   ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
2016-07-15 17:34     ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
2016-07-19 18:57       ` Mikael Morin
2016-07-20  9:39         ` Andre Vehreschild [this message]
2016-07-20 19:18           ` Mikael Morin
2016-07-21 19:05             ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
2016-08-04  3:09               ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
2016-08-09 11:23                 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2016-08-09 17:44                   ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
2016-09-07 21:01                   ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
     [not found]                     ` <CAHqFgjXbwQQnnZp5N+WtWnxNxWducGcU9QSdHRhCdPwNf1tdBQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-09-19 15:55                       ` Andre Vehreschild
2016-09-21 18:04                         ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
2016-09-28 13:13                           ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
2016-08-08 17:12   ` Dan Nagle
2017-01-18  6:42 Damian Rouson
     [not found] <1474481042.70029.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <FD49FDC8-1AAF-4ED4-BB07-734F323AEA34@sourceryinstitute.org>
2017-01-18 17:20   ` Andre Vehreschild
2017-01-18 17:55     ` Alessandro Fanfarillo
     [not found]     ` <CAKT_9NXOrmL0m2pX-wgk7V2WnAJMd8eJvp+UYvMJHQs-QEMdOA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-01-18 18:01       ` Andre Vehreschild
2017-01-18 18:18         ` Alessandro Fanfarillo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160720113913.24e1f404@vepi2 \
    --to=vehre@gmx.de \
    --cc=burnus@net-b.de \
    --cc=fanfarillo.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=morin-mikael@orange.fr \
    --cc=paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).