From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26696 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2017 14:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26678 invoked by uid 89); 4 Nov 2017 14:46:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:U*damian, dear, Dear X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 14:46:43 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vA4Ekfkt062008 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Nov 2017 07:46:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vA4Ekenf062007; Sat, 4 Nov 2017 07:46:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2017 14:46:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: Paul Richard Thomas Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches , Damian Rouson Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR78641 - [6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on polymorphic allocatable function in array constructor Message-ID: <20171104144640.GA61984@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 12:02:58PM +0000, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Dear All, > > This patch allows the assignment of class array constructors to > derived type arrays. It is straightforward enough that the ChangeLogs > and the comment are sufficient explanation. > > Bootstraps and regtests on FC23/x86_64 - OK for all three branches? > OK. -- Steve