From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123467 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2018 20:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 123444 invoked by uid 89); 7 Feb 2018 20:47:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:263 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:47:28 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w17KlQB8041380 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:47:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w17KlQw2041379; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:47:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:47:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: Thomas Koenig Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 68560 Message-ID: <20180207204726.GA41342@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <97d52e14-12e3-d02f-0918-7483927150af@netcologne.de> <405320c8-a854-4e2b-cb4b-a0d3a32b4371@netcologne.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <405320c8-a854-4e2b-cb4b-a0d3a32b4371@netcologne.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:42:04PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Here's an update on the patch - I realized that it is not necessary > to check for the actual argument, it is always present. > > OK for trunk? > Yes. -- Steve