On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:13:10PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> In fixing PR fortran/83633, it seems the patch I committed
> introduced an ICE for nonsensical invalid Fortran.  The 
> attached patch cures the ICE and now (re)issues an error
> message.
> 
> The basic problem seems to boil down to the recursive 
> calling of gfc_simplify_expr reduces "huge(1_8)+1_8" to
> "constant + constant".  When the chain of gfc_simplify_expr
> tries to reduces this expression an overflow occurs.  An
> error message is queud but never emitted, and the result
> is set to NULL and both constants are freed.  The NULL is
> passed back up through the chain of gfc_simplify_expr.
> At some point that NULL pointer is referenced.  The patch
> works around the problem by passing the result with the
> overflow value up the chain.  
> 
> Regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd.  I intend to commit
> this patch tomorrow, which on my clock is only 2.75 hours
> away.
> 
> 2018-03-09  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
> 
>         PR fortran/84734
>         * arith.c (check_result, eval_intrinsic):  If result overflows, pass
>         the expression up the chain instead of a NULL pointer.
> 
> 2018-03-09  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
> 
>         PR fortran/84734
>         * gfortran.dg/pr84734.f90: New test.
> 

Now with an attached patch.

-- 
Steve