public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@charter.net>,
	       Fritz Reese <fritzoreese@gmail.com>,
	       Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist.janne@gmail.com>,
	       Fortran List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Desire to allocate bit in DT_PARM bitmask for DEC FORMAT compatibility purposes
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180326191522.GA49327@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180326074240.GP8577@tucnak>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 09:42:40AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 08:44:41PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Now that you mention it, -std=dec would prevent a user from
> > specifically requesting, say, only Fortran 95 with DEC
> > extensions (i.e, -std=f95 -fdec).
> > 
> > So, to prevent a bikeshed and micro-engineering, I think you
> > should go with using bit 28 to comunicate with the runtime
> > and put everything under -fdec in the FE.
> 
> In that case, we would have two bits that are always set based on flag_dec
> in the compiler.
> 
> Thus, wouldn't following patch be better?  I.e. just rename the existing bit
> from a single particular DEC extension to indicate it turns on all runtime
> DEC extensions we support, now or in the future?
> 
> Is this ok for trunk now (if it passes bootstrap/regtest)?  Jeff then can
> follow with his patch in stage1 just using this bit.
> 

Jakub,

I'll going to be traveling for meetings over he next
week, so will only have limited time and email access.
I will defer to Jerry as he is much more familiar with
the runtime library IO routines.

-- 
Steve

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-26 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-20 18:41 Jeff Law
2018-03-21 18:35 ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-03-21 17:29   ` Jeff Law
2018-03-21 18:38     ` Janne Blomqvist
2018-03-21 19:26       ` Jeff Law
2018-03-22  5:49       ` Jeff Law
2018-03-23  2:07         ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-03-23  9:02           ` Janne Blomqvist
2018-03-23  9:08             ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-03-23 14:22             ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-03-23  9:35           ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-03-23  8:39             ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-03-23 14:46               ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-03-23 19:12               ` Jeff Law
2018-03-23  9:35             ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-03-23 13:26             ` Lukasz Kolodziejczyk
2018-03-23 14:47               ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-03-23 19:39               ` Jeff Law
2018-03-23 21:36                 ` Steve Kargl
2018-03-23 19:58             ` Jeff Law
2018-03-23 21:32               ` Fritz Reese
2018-03-24  9:35                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-03-24 16:04                   ` Steve Kargl
2018-03-24 17:35                     ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-03-24 17:11                       ` Steve Kargl
2018-03-24 18:20                         ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-03-25 18:48                           ` Jeff Law
2018-03-25 19:09                             ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-03-26  3:41                               ` Jeff Law
2018-03-26  3:44                             ` Steve Kargl
2018-03-26  7:42                               ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-03-26 12:14                                 ` Fritz Reese
2018-03-26 19:15                                 ` Steve Kargl [this message]
2018-03-26 21:04                                   ` Jeff Law
2018-03-26 21:03                                 ` Jeff Law
2018-03-27  9:14                                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-03-28  1:02                                     ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-03-23 19:56           ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180326191522.GA49327@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
    --to=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
    --cc=blomqvist.janne@gmail.com \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=fritzoreese@gmail.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jvdelisle@charter.net \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).