From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 109530 invoked by alias); 23 May 2018 20:27:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109415 invoked by uid 89); 23 May 2018 20:27:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:406, redo X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2018 20:27:49 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w4NKRm9E044602 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:27:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w4NKRm0L044601 for fortran@gcc.gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:27:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 20:27:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: regression with gfortran.dg/actual_pointer_function_1.f90 Message-ID: <20180523202748.GA44594@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20180519192920.GA21577@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180519192920.GA21577@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:29:20PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > It seems a recent patch has caused a regression with > gfortran.dg/actual_pointer_function_1.f90 on x86_64-*-freebsd. > I do have a few local patches, so I'll revert those > and re-do a bootstrap on a clean gcc/ tree. > It seems a local patch was causing the problem. -- Steve