From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7A23851C24 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:05:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org BB7A23851C24 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 12E65nK3002811 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:05:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 12E65mGG002810; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:05:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:05:48 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Jerry DeLisle Cc: gfortran Subject: Re: 12 PR fixed Message-ID: <20210314060548.GA2666@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20210313213338.GA1350@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <407787d3-e6af-ed45-d02d-708dff36a9bb@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:05:53 -0000 On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 09:13:53PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote: > Well, I am seeing the falling upon a closer look.  I do not know if related > to the patch yet.  Lets make sure this is fixed. > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90   -O  (internal compiler error) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90   -O  (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96013.f90   -O  (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96025.f90   -O  (internal compiler error) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96025.f90   -O   (test for errors, line 5) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96025.f90   -O  (test for excess errors) On my system, === gfortran Summary === # of expected passes 56305 # of expected failures 232 # of unsupported tests 109 /home/kargl/gcc/obj/gcc/gfortran version 11.0.1 20210313 (experimental) (GCC) AFAIK, my tree is up-to-date, but then again, git is a foreign beast to me. Too bad that the people responsible for the switch to git throw 15 years of corporate knowledge for little gain. I see what I can do for a ChangeLog. Some of my patches have lingered in bugzilla for too long. I don't remember all of the details. -- steve