From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62FBA3950C81; Mon, 3 May 2021 15:20:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 62FBA3950C81 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 143FKbnh029187 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 May 2021 08:20:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 143FKaB3029186; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:20:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 08:20:36 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Andre Vehreschild Cc: GCC-Fortran-ML , GCC-Patches-ML Subject: Re: [Ping, Patch, Fortran, Update 2] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran Message-ID: <20210503152036.GA29178@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20210403172846.GA14134@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20210404053331.GA18048@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20210423184357.643efbdf@vepi2> <20210423171817.GA75072@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20210424124945.46b1da51@vepi2> <20210425200334.GA94808@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20210426123636.7eb24c37@vepi2> <20210503112110.7580eb41@vepi2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210503112110.7580eb41@vepi2> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 15:20:39 -0000 On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 11:21:10AM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > Ping! > > Ok for trunk? > > I have looked at other patches, but none was patching any location I have > worked on previously. Therefore I can't return the favor of reviewing any > currently open patches and have to ask for volunteers here. > > - Andre > I doubt I'm allowed to approve a patch, where I wrote a portion of it. However, if no one else steps forward in the next day or two, then I think you should commit. -- Steve