From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818CA38515E6; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 16:27:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 818CA38515E6 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 155GRHOt001021 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Jun 2021 09:27:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 155GRGfX001020; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 09:27:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 09:27:16 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Andre Vehreschild Cc: GCC-Fortran-ML , GCC-Patches-ML , Jerry D Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, backport 2 gcc-11] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran Message-ID: <20210605162716.GA1009@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20210424124945.46b1da51@vepi2> <20210425200334.GA94808@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20210426123636.7eb24c37@vepi2> <20210503112110.7580eb41@vepi2> <20210503152036.GA29178@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20210521100902.78d4aa4d@vepi2> <20210521150832.GA18015@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <656f6431-29e3-d32f-c2ae-ae8f989357b2@gmail.com> <20210522133911.4075c2e4@vepi2> <20210605160451.3f6af2b2@vepi2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210605160451.3f6af2b2@vepi2> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 16:27:21 -0000 On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 04:04:51PM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > I was asked to backport the patch for pr98301 to gcc-11. The patches have > been in mainline for two weeks without any defect reports I could fined. The > patch for mainline applied with a bit of shift cleanly. > > Regstested fine on x86_64/f33. Ok for backport gcc-11? > I think the backport is fine. -- Steve