From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
 [128.95.76.21])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0673F3858D28
 for <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 19:09:29 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0673F3858D28
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 19NJ9Sm8057000
 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sat, 23 Oct 2021 12:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 19NJ9RDU056850;
 Sat, 23 Oct 2021 12:09:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk)
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 12:09:27 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
Cc: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>,
 "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: libgomp.fortran/async_io_[1,2,3,4,8,9].f90 fail on FreeBSD
Message-ID: <20211023190927.GA49764@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <20211022194330.GB27024@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <5fabbaa1-30f6-2781-446e-8816a154c5df@netcologne.de>
 <20211023163115.GA80954@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <0c54f11c-c48f-a514-e9d8-9713d4719e98@net-b.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <0c54f11c-c48f-a514-e9d8-9713d4719e98@net-b.de>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 19:09:31 -0000

On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 08:00:44PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> On 23.10.21 18:31, Steve Kargl via Fortran wrote:
> > Do you know how to run a single libgomp.fortran test? I tried
> > % gmake check-fortran RUNTESTSFLAGS="gomp.exp=async_io.f90"
> > 
> > but this runs all the testcases.
> 
> First, it should be RUNTESTFLAGS=  (test not tests).

Yes, of course, it was a typo,

> I sincerely doubt that our Fortran commits have broken this – they are not
> related to anything like TS29113, BIND(C), polymorphism or assumed-rank. I
> am even skeptical that any OpenMP change could have caused that, given that
> those do not really use OpenMP at all – but only pthreads (which is the
> reason they are in libgomp as OpenMP also depends on threads). Granted, as
> they are compiled with -fopenmp, libgomp is linked in (but should never be
> called, except for library initialization).
> 
> Nonetheless, if it used to work and now fails, something must have changed,
> causing the breakage.
> 
> If you compile and run the program manually without the DejaGNU, does it
> fail when compiled as is, compiled with -pthreads, compiled with -fopenmp?
> 

I have the gfortran.log file, I'll see if I can reduce the log
to determine why things are broken now.

-- 
Steve