From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF63C3858403
 for <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 21:31:56 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DF63C3858403
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=kernel.crashing.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 1AJLUuwB019702;
 Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:30:56 -0600
Received: (from segher@localhost)
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 1AJLUtmd019699;
 Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:30:55 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to
 segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:30:55 -0600
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>,
 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>,
 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>,
 "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] User-visible changes for powerpc64-le-linux ABI changes
Message-ID: <20211119213055.GI614@gate.crashing.org>
References: <63b5434e-f8fa-97b3-d357-e25094579b16@netcologne.de>
 <bdc02706-a5ae-1389-906d-50c502b87d5f@linux.ibm.com>
 <YYA2FMfDR0yehJLA@toto.the-meissners.org>
 <628c8da1-9661-16ca-a5e2-45d27498b9fc@netcologne.de>
 <YZLwWnLuarW5SrL8@toto.the-meissners.org>
 <20211119173056.GF614@gate.crashing.org>
 <5fbbc7dd-e46e-47c5-a1e1-fcbdca52a952@netcologne.de>
 <41ef93ed-87e9-36b3-a785-2ebdcdac17a4@linux.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <41ef93ed-87e9-36b3-a785-2ebdcdac17a4@linux.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 21:31:58 -0000

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:36:33PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 11/19/21 1:09 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 06:42:18PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> >>> Sure, we can create an IBM vendor branch.
> >>
> >> It should not be an IBM branch, we should not mix that with community
> >> stuff.  Instead it should be in devel/.
> 
> Agreed, this would be better as a normal devel branch.
> 
> 
> >> I'll create it, but someone needs to come up with a good name.
> >> Something better than the "kind16" I would do ;-)
> > 
> > power-ieee128, maybe?  I do not think we need to adhere to the
> > somewhat outdated "rs6000" name :-)
> 
> Or how about gfortran-ieee128?

I have created devel/power-ieee128.  Descriptive names are good, but so
are shorter names.


Segher