From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcgf-fortran@m.gmane-mx.org>
Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844553858D28
 for <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri,  7 Jan 2022 21:05:51 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 844553858D28
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <gcgf-fortran@m.gmane-mx.org>) id 1n5wQo-000AYf-A8
 for fortran@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 22:05:50 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR103366 - [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
 gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc, at fortran/trans-expr.c:5647
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 22:05:38 +0100
Message-ID: <155976dc-2516-6409-4bf3-746bdeb27eb9@gmx.de>
References: <CAGkQGiLmYgpdcpU7GeF3Nh7=hu-uFhOBrJbAMzZhenXSgGOE9w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.4.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <CAGkQGiLmYgpdcpU7GeF3Nh7=hu-uFhOBrJbAMzZhenXSgGOE9w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 21:05:52 -0000
Message-ID: <20220107210538.Ktri7rOC8aZTVKzlOO3OIBlmaKiGJONl-2Vt5Twe7EQ@z>

Hi Paul,

Am 07.01.22 um 14:42 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran:
> I doubt that this is a regression on 9-11 branches since the testcase
> compiles correctly on each of my copies of these branches. IMHO it is
> rather more likely to have been caused by
> 64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261, which introduced this new form of
> gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc.
> 
> The patch is self-explanatory. OK for mainline?

I do not have a copy of F2017; but I can find your comment in the F2018
document.

OK with this change.

Thanks for the patch!

Harald

> Paul
> 
> Fortran: Match unlimited polymorphic argument to assumed type [PR103366].
> 
> 2022-01-07  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
> 
> gcc/fortran
> PR fortran/103366
> * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc): Allow unlimited
> polymorphic actual argument passed to assumed type formal.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR fortran/103366
> * gfortran.dg/pr103366.f90: New test.