From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618BF385AC33 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 19:35:28 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 618BF385AC33 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 20PJZRsZ069833 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:35:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 20PJZQRG069832; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:35:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:35:26 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: FX Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: New signaling NaN causes 12 testsuite failures Message-ID: <20220125193526.GA69322@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20220125004453.GA16729@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <1DA16214-53F0-4B2E-AB56-503AAD59B266@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1DA16214-53F0-4B2E-AB56-503AAD59B266@gmail.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_SHORT, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 19:35:30 -0000 On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:09:15AM +0100, FX wrote: > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/signaling_3.f90 -O0 execution test > > For that one, can you confirm it’s a 64-bit run, not -m32? > I’ve fixed that case: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=d0336ab4e7e2eb58a64d8ee4e5e8083dd53a4d2d > With --disable-multilib, so no -m32 support, I still signaling_3.f90 failing. In ! { dg-do run { xfail { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && ilp32 } } } ! x87 / x86-32 ABI is unsuitable for signaling NaNs I have no idea what ilp32 is trying to do, but if the second line of the comment means that i387 fpu should be used, it isn't on freebsd. -- Steve