From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 781E83858C55 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 21:41:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 781E83858C55 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m.gmane-mx.org Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ogv6P-0004O6-RK for fortran@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 23:41:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: fortran@gcc.gnu.org From: Harald Anlauf Subject: Re: [PATCH, v3] Fortran: error recovery for invalid types in array constructors [PR107000] Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 23:41:49 +0200 Message-ID: <29551a59-fdb1-53f1-1bbf-6123e61d29bb@gmx.de> References: <1bf3b7b5-39ac-0c94-256c-f739a4746a7b@orange.fr> <97dd508f-83b0-5ed0-8cb5-f4f7c8fe08e6@orange.fr> <05a23138-adcd-2526-698c-1fa846f1810b@orange.fr> <05f415c0-80bc-c04e-a142-1251bf82bb1d@gmx.de> <30b93c16-9be9-d2b1-b6c8-c34f4ab8cfff@orange.fr> <43da1a08-ddc3-bb5c-6f64-cf17f891e35e@orange.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <43da1a08-ddc3-bb5c-6f64-cf17f891e35e@orange.fr> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Message-ID: <20221007214149.abq1FQeBikQIP6DvZA07vg6pk56pzMbLC07MFm2_d24@z> Hi Mikael, Am 07.10.22 um 22:26 schrieb Mikael Morin: > Le 07/10/2022 à 21:47, Mikael Morin a écrit : >> Let me have a look. > > The attached patch works with your test, I just moved the checks into > the loops. > I'm now checking the patch against the full fortran testsuite. > I'm (finally) fine with that version, what do you think of it? I'm fine with it. If it regtests ok, then this should be it.