From: Mikael Morin <mikael@gcc.gnu.org>
To: fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Fix argument evaluation order [PR92178]
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 12:32:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230711103253.1589353-1-mikael@gcc.gnu.org> (raw)
Hello,
this is a followup to Harald's recent work [1] on the evaluation order
of arguments, when one of them is passed to an intent(out) allocatable
dummy and is deallocated before the call.
This extends Harald's fix to support:
- scalars passed to assumed rank dummies (patch 1),
- scalars passed to assumed rank dummies with the data reference
depending on its own content (patch 2),
- arrays with the data reference depending on its own content
(patch 3).
There is one (last?) case which is not supported, for which I have opened
a separate PR [2].
Regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for master?
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-July/059562.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110618
Mikael Morin (3):
fortran: defer class wrapper initialization after deallocation
[PR92178]
fortran: Factor data references for scalar class argument wrapping
[PR92178]
fortran: Reorder array argument evaluation parts [PR92178]
gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc | 3 +
gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc | 130 +++++++++++++++++---
gcc/fortran/trans.cc | 28 +++++
gcc/fortran/trans.h | 8 +-
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intent_out_19.f90 | 22 ++++
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intent_out_20.f90 | 33 +++++
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intent_out_21.f90 | 33 +++++
7 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intent_out_19.f90
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intent_out_20.f90
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intent_out_21.f90
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 10:32 Mikael Morin [this message]
2023-07-11 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] fortran: defer class wrapper initialization after deallocation [PR92178] Mikael Morin
2023-07-11 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] fortran: Factor data references for scalar class argument wrapping [PR92178] Mikael Morin
2023-07-11 10:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] fortran: Reorder array argument evaluation parts [PR92178] Mikael Morin
2023-07-13 19:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix argument evaluation order [PR92178] Harald Anlauf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230711103253.1589353-1-mikael@gcc.gnu.org \
--to=mikael@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).