From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from impout004.msg.chrl.nc.charter.net (impout004aa.msg.chrl.nc.charter.net [47.43.20.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C1C9398EC2C; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:48:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6C1C9398EC2C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=charter.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jvdelisle@charter.net Received: from [192.168.1.9] ([96.41.221.129]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id A2xwlFUwlxxx6A2xxl5UMy; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:48:30 +0000 Authentication-Results: charter.net; none X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=TK7xtGta c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=07pILqX15KmGv9ZXTMmBNA==:117 a=07pILqX15KmGv9ZXTMmBNA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=PG7a3VwNjLJ0cgMDiGUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Subject: Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR98825 Unexpected behavior of FORTRAN FORMAT expressions when suppressing new line with '$' To: Thomas Koenig , gfortran Cc: gcc-patches References: <00d31605-501a-4967-9872-34e64b8b77c5@netcologne.de> From: Jerry DeLisle Message-ID: <273a801e-4111-c300-b48a-546e525025e8@charter.net> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:48:27 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <00d31605-501a-4967-9872-34e64b8b77c5@netcologne.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPp6kHLX4anvKRTHKQ7NfLjdxFxp+6UHe2g//gTN45sjxRIJiOy/tonalcoMwXWWAY6UOJe5l7eoXyUo3c03v36jAYqxJiOjLEuRejeFXcrCAdIWm1/M 1TMpm7PkbrfOLjM2BJonVsPDJhLbXRBcknET5eTH6BoBBN7pOCATBFeHUEULaZhVeqWJBtXMiasbMRta1PyRNmgg138ITV4pJbkpeup0yen3PAwcu5WFqLr/ crz1o8hb9Ib7xBCzU9rwYg== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:48:31 -0000 On 2/7/21 9:07 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Hi Jerry, > >> OK for trunk and backport to 10 since it is simple enough? > > OK for trunk. > > Because this is a user-visible change (even if we did the wrong > thing before) I don't feel that we should backport (but I am > open to suggestions otherwise). > > Could you also mention this in gcc-11/changes.html ? > > Best regards > >     Thomas The above was committed.  I had a very frustrating experiance with the push process.  Over and over attempting to push and having it rejected for an invalid PR reference. The directory that holds the runtime library is called "libgfortran".  The official gcc component in Bugzilla is called "libfortran".  There is no letter "g" in that component name and thus the hooks rejected my push attempts.  The only reason I figured it out, after exhausting about 25 other variations I could think of is that I thought "What does the PR think this is?" Well that was not intuitively obvious, but my bug tracking persistance hung in there. Sheesh! Just telling people so others might be aware of this little detail. Thomas, I will get around to updating the changes.html. Thanks and best regards, Jerry