From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp01.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.123]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091F23858CDA for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:11:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 091F23858CDA Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orange.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=orange.fr Received: from [192.168.1.17] ([86.215.174.255]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id aAvxosflITLjwaAw2odpBE; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:11:19 +0200 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.17] X-ME-Auth: bW9yaW4tbWlrYWVsQG9yYW5nZS5mcg== X-ME-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:11:19 +0200 X-ME-IP: 86.215.174.255 Message-ID: <29aa6540-0c43-aefd-04a3-b09177736be1@orange.fr> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:11:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] fortran: Support clobbering of variable subreferences [PR88364] From: Mikael Morin To: Harald Anlauf , Thomas Koenig , Richard Biener Cc: Mikael Morin , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org References: <20220916202439.549820-1-mikael@gcc.gnu.org> <20220916202439.549820-10-mikael@gcc.gnu.org> <3edab734-f5bb-5557-ff98-b0ce47d7c510@orange.fr> <3ef8c5c4-35a1-fa60-2a2d-a7bb3fbd35fc@gmx.de> <9996bd59-9cf1-12df-faa5-7d546e5732f7@orange.fr> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <9996bd59-9cf1-12df-faa5-7d546e5732f7@orange.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Le 18/09/2022 à 22:55, Mikael Morin a écrit : > Assumed shape can be non-contiguous so have to be excluded, > Thinking about it again, assumed shape are probably acceptable, but there should be a check for contiguousness on the actual argument.