From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B2433858D32 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 00:00:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9B2433858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AE633EF3; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:00:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.80] (188-23-63-236.adsl.highway.telekom.at [188.23.63.236]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D40BD33F0C; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:00:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 01:00:25 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Tobias Burnus cc: Steve Kargl , fortran@gcc.gnu.org, Thomas Koenig Subject: Re: libgomp.fortran/async_io_[1,2,3,4,8,9].f90 fail on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <2ae10afd-c3f4-5ca9-80d6-4c0e9fad90f8@pfeifer.com> References: <20211022194330.GB27024@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5fabbaa1-30f6-2781-446e-8816a154c5df@netcologne.de> <20211023163115.GA80954@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <0c54f11c-c48f-a514-e9d8-9713d4719e98@net-b.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote: > @Gerald: Do you see those issues as well? Or do you have an idea what > could go wrong? > > @Gerald (and unrelated to the topic below): Can you provide more log data > regarding the failing gfortran.dg tests? (Esp. excess errors but also the > ICE.) Apologies, it appears I failed to respond back then. Is there anything I may be able to help with still? I probably won't be able to debug/hack this, but if you need some more detailed logs or would like me to test a patch or run some commands, I certainly can do that. > On 23.10.21 20:00, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> On 23.10.21 18:31, Steve Kargl via Fortran wrote: >>> commit date of 2020-05-23 for async_io_9.f90, I know these >>> tests were passing in the past. > If I look at Gerald's results for x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.2 at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-October/730072.html > I do not see those async fails. Cheers, Gerald