From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de [IPv6:2001:4dd0:100:1062:25:2:0:2]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C243858400; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:02:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 90C243858400 Received: from cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de [89.1.8.201]) by cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722DD124D3; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 22:02:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:2a0a:a540:2738:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d] (2a0a-a540-2738-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de [IPv6:2a0a:a540:2738:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 002B911D90; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 22:02:15 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [patch, Fortran] Make REAL(KIND=16) detection more robust To: FX , fortran@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Iain Sandoe , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <8CA66B79-11B1-40B2-B361-F8835EF4DF1B@gmail.com> From: Thomas Koenig Message-ID: <2bd8fb54-462c-228a-b002-35f7cf4d080d@netcologne.de> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 22:02:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8CA66B79-11B1-40B2-B361-F8835EF4DF1B@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NetCologne-Spam: L X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 002B911D90 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_SHORT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:02:23 -0000 Hi FX, I am not sure the logic is correct for POWER (old style) where we have a 16-byte long double made up from two 8-byte doubles, which is not __float128 (IFmode), see https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-November/056912.html I have a proposal: Since I am currently trying to unravel this on the power-ieee128 branch, I would like to take this on, if that is fine with you. Best regards Thomas