From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <morin-mikael@orange.fr>
Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr
 [80.12.242.127])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A6343858407
 for <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:26:02 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3A6343858407
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orange.fr
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=orange.fr
Received: from [192.168.1.17] ([86.215.161.154]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA
 id GQBkonEv881u5GQBqoQ2U0; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 21:26:00 +0200
X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.17]
X-ME-Auth: MDU4MTIxYWM4YWI0ZGE4ZTUwZWZmNTExZmI2ZWZlMThkM2ZhYiE5OWRkOGM=
X-ME-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 21:26:00 +0200
X-ME-IP: 86.215.161.154
Message-ID: <2c940b18-08f2-adeb-6ac3-22e89b72440d@orange.fr>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 21:25:52 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix invalid rank error in ASSOCIATED when rank
 is remapped [PR77652]
Content-Language: en-US
To: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Cc: fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <trinity-b07ff04e-affb-445c-b27a-14692575dbe0-1658434335166@3c-app-gmx-bs48>
 <8e300265-e24c-59c2-19b0-3d74fc5ed425@orange.fr>
 <trinity-c3b41188-1f8e-47c5-8b58-75c8cfa9bf9c-1658764864841@3c-app-gmx-bap61>
 <cc82482b-9735-ca48-6a2b-4f7c6a31de1b@orange.fr>
 <trinity-71255ca2-6b50-4e0b-92a3-2e81b5c0f029-1658780286309@3c-app-gmx-bs72>
From: Mikael Morin <morin-mikael@orange.fr>
In-Reply-To: <trinity-71255ca2-6b50-4e0b-92a3-2e81b5c0f029-1658780286309@3c-app-gmx-bs72>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FROM,
 JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:26:04 -0000

Le 25/07/2022 à 22:18, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
> I would normally trust NAG more than Intel and Cray.  
… and yourself, it seems.  Too bad.

> If somebody else convinces me to accept that NAG has it wrong this time, I would be happy to proceed.
It won’t convince you about NAG, but here are two reasons to proceed:
  - Consensus among the maintainers is sufficient; it’s the case here.
  - If uncertain, let’s be rather too permissive than too strict; it’s 
fine as long as the runtime answer is right.