Re: [Patch, fortran] PR35339 Optimize implied do loops in io statements

[Nicolas Koenig <koenigni@student.ethz.ch>]

Hello Dominique,

it appears the problem with this test case is that it fails because of 
another bug (see PR80945 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945), that is triggered 
in this test case by the patch. What is normally done in such a case? 
Should I add a check for this special case or just wait until the bug is 
fixed?

Thanks for your patience & help!

Nicolas


On 06/01/2017 04:37 PM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
>> Le 1 juin 2017 à 16:19, Dominique d'Humières <dominiq@lps.ens.fr> a écrit :
>>
>> I see
>>
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_2.f90   -O1  execution test
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_2.f90   -O2  execution test
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_2.f90   -Os  execution test
>>
>> Dominique
> Reduced test
>
> PROGRAM hello
>
>      IMPLICIT NONE
>
>      CHARACTER(LEN=:),DIMENSION(:),ALLOCATABLE :: array_lineas
>      CHARACTER(LEN=:),DIMENSION(:),ALLOCATABLE :: array_copia
>      character (3), dimension (2) :: array_fijo = ["abc","def"]
>      character (100) :: buffer
>      INTEGER :: largo , cant_lineas , i
>
>      write (buffer, "(2a3)") array_fijo
>
>      largo = LEN (array_fijo)
>
>      cant_lineas = size (array_fijo, 1)
>
>      ALLOCATE(CHARACTER(LEN=largo) :: array_lineas(cant_lineas))
>
>      READ(buffer,"(2a3)") (array_lineas(i),i=1,cant_lineas)
>
>      print *, array_lineas
>      print *, array_fijo
>       if (any (array_lineas .ne. array_fijo)) call abort
>
> END PROGRAM
>
> Dominique
>