From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.127]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76BC13858D28 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:37:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 76BC13858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orange.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=orange.fr Received: from [192.168.1.17] ([86.253.179.215]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id kpA1nVgCzFyeGkpA6nDe1V; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:37:35 +0200 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.17] X-ME-Auth: MDU4MTIxYWM4YWI0ZGE4ZTUwZWZmNTExZmI2ZWZlMThkM2ZhYiE5OWRkOGM= X-ME-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:37:35 +0200 X-ME-IP: 86.253.179.215 Message-ID: <3f701c0a-d0bd-bafd-f24d-6f727c18c379@orange.fr> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:37:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 From: Mikael Morin Subject: Re: *ping* [patch, wwwdocs] Mention POWER IEEE128 changes for gcc 12 To: Thomas Koenig , "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches References: <9c3e420f-afcf-f2ff-8ea7-35da6f7d7675@netcologne.de> <340d0801-3266-f384-c267-63683c7d60b0@netcologne.de> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <340d0801-3266-f384-c267-63683c7d60b0@netcologne.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:37:37 -0000 Le 29/04/2022 à 22:10, Thomas Koenig via Fortran a écrit : > >> the attached patch documents the support for IEEE long double for >> Fortran.  OK?  Suggestions for better wording? > > I'd like to get this in before the gcc12 release.  It would also > qualify as obviously correct, I think :-) so I'll commit this > on Sunday unless there are any objections. > May I suggest to rewrite the first sentence as: On POWER systems which support it, the -mabi=ieeelongdouble option is now available to use the IEEE 128-bit floating point format for REAL(KIND=16) types. OK in any case. Anything is better than nothing.