From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-21.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF0C3858C29 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2023 18:58:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3FF0C3858C29 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=orange.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=orange.fr ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3FF0C3858C29 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=80.12.242.21 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701025141; cv=none; b=FmVlr5irsGD/A059NAI6XJYBuutd1QkY6DxlyC8+RGhrARZukXqml5zCAlXk0odHoqeGM/s9KB8Jr4XtVd2aL98LF/zzRvz+9du93coUsBhn+MH3i7v+6uTAju3hbZhEeaNfn2QU4KrMlRlfFbOmue3EJyaMeHf+MRDeqnGCmBc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701025141; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u7loCOYvUZQe08NqLO/wUWQ9RPRY4EJa0j9Ah6tsXFU=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=P1CNElmS2baBD6P1EVlEjrqT7BNwrToza2RpnOAmX+zJulegFgfa15DSQ8W98ofpQ4HlQAiYw0ouDV9KD2DQqF6WXw/6yGWBkPq4/NqO6aY1b6532kZo0+mrVkiOTK1j+fkOz2YY/2KXepeIWALsmAFhTKUFQExemjR0KzSS8IA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([86.215.161.51]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id 7KLDrzLHq1Jmd7KLIrzVV8; Sun, 26 Nov 2023 19:58:56 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.fr; s=t20230301; t=1701025136; bh=L5oCp2WEQN/2HUYn2giHfx1QyGL7t6IvZ5ydM8aaXBI=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=IyG9c5g+tyZWG8D8o4u2ZeiVQPJjq2J1DH+Qwvjmkt68DfL01E6vzEY+UxgBlzmPC Mq2S+OGJKXRhUo+HbYi1613/tU1XE+HrHiv3cRqlyNhFsrAOTgqN2Lf5Kl/n5628S7 sWHSJHgmJ+lEnzl9AoDswglH3W1mO/9Gj3vriOxi6xj8zswwIZPMYmXpCfDQkfK/gF tLGnlMOkvUq4KwRudlXaA53xu+DAlNN9BI3STntsj1P1nz55w790xlu8bp72elEKXj DKmtDAZdjH2Bk2gpc8DNx7zgck2mITTEnCbPFyhkSGLPWbsjs/tdAA3cWOqBpQZFw8 UnCtaJJ+AC4XQ== X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.13] X-ME-Auth: bW9yaW4tbWlrYWVsQG9yYW5nZS5mcg== X-ME-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 19:58:56 +0100 X-ME-IP: 86.215.161.51 Message-ID: <40d1cf4e-1629-4fc9-8ea5-4d71cefe5f43@orange.fr> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 19:58:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: avoid obsolescence warning for COMMON with submodule [PR111880] To: Harald Anlauf , fortran , gcc-patches References: Content-Language: fr From: Mikael Morin In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hello, Le 23/11/2023 à 22:59, Harald Anlauf a écrit : > Dear all, > > the PR is about a redundant obsolescence warning for COMMON when > a symbols appears in the scope of a submodule. As we did not warn > for use-associated symbols, it seemed natural to extend this to > symbols that are used in a submodule. Or am I missing anything? > > Regtests cleanly on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? > Yes, looks good. Obvious I'm tempted to say. > The PR is marked as a regression (the warning appeared in gcc-9). > It looks simple enough for backporting, or does anybody see any > risk here? > No, you can go ahead. Thanks Mikael