From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19EF13858D28; Sun, 30 Apr 2023 07:58:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 19EF13858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE44E1FE1F; Sun, 30 Apr 2023 07:58:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1682841535; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0JcnjrIL7njSzjbn5JlATvSTviBV/fGvPQ5hh/HXeGY=; b=XnXHWiEOOUYMfVsWU8clfc18kE/uk0Vn2LLEj84oDhRiDXz3Zl/pXeYKARCGScsVvO8pbs 19CV5EgXSEC8bKQAiUkKkcCpd/fGIRNhoCNo9sq3Z/holk/BS0oc6DJ8hKdwditsQefnSE gUJhXCoYOnGLejzHz/qInSJm9CWuI28= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1682841535; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0JcnjrIL7njSzjbn5JlATvSTviBV/fGvPQ5hh/HXeGY=; b=OnMw/U6lorRVfr0yJAooBCmhg82aQxuMosu7DfRug+t3C/SeyLjW7X77FJnUyV0vrhTg22 9IfBewFlQuEsXuBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C956D13319; Sun, 30 Apr 2023 07:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id PlFWML8fTmTLbQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Sun, 30 Apr 2023 07:58:55 +0000 Message-ID: <417dc2b1-3c95-4dd1-f0f8-756e9b44d641@suse.cz> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023 09:58:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.1 Subject: Re: libsanitizer: sync from master To: Florian Weimer Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Xi Ruoyao , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Lulu Cheng , "H.J. Lu" References: <6a8c0966-139a-1536-4ef3-ec99542bdf02@suse.cz> <02a9e4ef-4d83-e4c4-cfeb-5e94fe63f1b3@suse.cz> <87mt2uwl5d.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87sfck8ims.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= In-Reply-To: <87sfck8ims.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 4/28/23 11:23, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Martin Liška: > >> On 4/26/23 20:31, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> * Martin Liška: >>> >>>> On 11/15/22 16:47, Martin Liška wrote: >>>>> Hi. >>>>> >>>>> I've just pushed libsanitizer update that was tested on x86_64-linux and ppc64le-linux systems. >>>>> Moreover, I run bootstrap on x86_64-linux and checked ABI difference with abidiff. >>>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> And I've done the same now and merged upstream version 3185e47b5a8444e9fd. >>> >>> So … we have the issue that involves interceptors outside of libc.so.6, >>> namely crypt, crypt_r, and I posted an upstream patch for this: >>> >>> sanitizers: Disable crypt, crypt_r interceptors for glibc >>> >>> >>> Can we just apply this downstream for now? It blocks various folks from >>> using the sanitizers in their projects. >> >> Hello. >> >> Your upstream revision has been already accepted, so please apply it >> and I'm going to do one more merge from upstream in the following >> days. Does it work for you? > > It's moving in a different direction now: > > But that's okay for me as well. > > Thanks, > Florian > Hello. I've just pushed merged libsanitizer that contains both crypt-related changes and x32 fix from H.J. Cheers, Martin