From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Received: from cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de
 [89.1.8.212])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF903857C55;
 Mon, 23 Nov 2020 22:16:49 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org DBF903857C55
Received: from cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de [89.1.8.203])
 by cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA4512674;
 Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:16:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C815611DF0;
 Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:16:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [2001:4dd7:217d:0:5f68:b366:cad1:81a0]
 (helo=cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de)
 by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate 4.11.6)
 (envelope-from <tkoenig@netcologne.de>)
 id 5fbc34d0-0799-7f0000012729-7f000001e7d6-1
 for <multiple-recipients>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:16:48 +0100
Received: from linux-p51k.fritz.box
 (2001-4dd7-217d-0-5f68-b366-cad1-81a0.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de
 [IPv6:2001:4dd7:217d:0:5f68:b366:cad1:81a0])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
 Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:16:46 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: *ping* [patch, fortran] Correct fndecls for some library functions
To: Iain Sandoe <idsandoe@googlemail.com>
Cc: Fortran List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <7d637428-5aab-f3f6-e698-ecaf93084c96@netcologne.de>
 <51bbd9ab-c8c2-76fc-ae1b-2b92fa829d33@netcologne.de>
 <3B4D07D1-5AAD-4783-A15B-7B72578D7AE1@googlemail.com>
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Message-ID: <47c5efcb-e041-ab4a-eec1-3ab594438454@netcologne.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:16:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3B4D07D1-5AAD-4783-A15B-7B72578D7AE1@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 22:16:51 -0000

Hi Iain,

> Is there some testcase that can be used to see a progression from
> applying this patch?

I haven't been able to find anything.  Previously, everything was
passed as ". r r r r r r" and so on; there were also too many
arguments for functions like findloc.  Since "r " is the most
conservative thing you can do, I suppose it didn't lead to wrong code,
at least.

Best regards

	Thomas