From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <morin-mikael@orange.fr>
Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr
 [80.12.242.127])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFBAF3858003
 for <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed,  9 Feb 2022 20:38:38 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EFBAF3858003
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orange.fr
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=orange.fr
Received: from [192.168.1.17] ([86.253.179.215]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA
 id HtjAnh3EN0Z1CHtjYnHo4R; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 21:38:37 +0100
X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.17]
X-ME-Auth: MDU4MTIxYWM4YWI0ZGE4ZTUwZWZmNTExZmI2ZWZlMThkM2ZhYiE5OWRkOGM=
X-ME-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 21:38:37 +0100
X-ME-IP: 86.253.179.215
Message-ID: <4c37f0b1-1be5-4869-cbee-fce7d4bb6a5e@orange.fr>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 21:38:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/66193 - ICE for initialisation of some
 non-zero-sized arrays
Content-Language: en-US
To: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>, fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
 gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <trinity-b5b286fc-37f0-4ed6-a939-01b94f5c7b21-1644182049659@3c-app-gmx-bs40>
From: Mikael Morin <morin-mikael@orange.fr>
In-Reply-To: <trinity-b5b286fc-37f0-4ed6-a939-01b94f5c7b21-1644182049659@3c-app-gmx-bs40>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FROM,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:38:40 -0000

Hello

Le 06/02/2022 à 22:14, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit :
> Dear Fortranners,
> 
> some instances of valid constant array constructors did lead to ICEs.
> It turned out that on the one hand we need to attempt simplification of
> elements of the constructor, especially when we encounter parenthesized
> expression.  On the other hand the occurence of type specs and empty
> constructors need to be handled more gracefully.
> 
> Parts of the PR have been fixed previously, so the remaining part was
> rather simple.
> 
> The testcase is based on Gerhards latest example attached to the PR.
> 
> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?
> 
OK.

> Given the simplicity of the patch and that it is an ICE on valid code,
> would this qualify for later application to 11-branch?
> 
I suppose it does.

Thanks.