From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Received: from cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de
 [IPv6:2001:4dd0:100:1062:25:2:0:2])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 648F13858430
 for <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:36:41 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 648F13858430
Received: from cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de [89.1.8.202])
 by cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DF512773;
 Thu, 31 Mar 2022 20:36:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:4dd4:f722:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d]
 (2001-4dd4-f722-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de
 [IPv6:2001:4dd4:f722:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E1DD1205D;
 Thu, 31 Mar 2022 20:36:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4f4c6b5f-995f-385a-bacc-59e96090dc97@netcologne.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 20:36:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: allocatable arrays and -fmax-stack-var-size
Content-Language: en-US
To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
 "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20220331170747.GA57166@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
In-Reply-To: <20220331170747.GA57166@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NetCologne-Spam: L
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8E1DD1205D
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:36:47 -0000

Hi Steve,

> So, it seems that at some point in the past, the option
> -fmax-stack-var-size was expanded to allow the placement
> of an allocatable array into static memory.  This has
> a possibly unintended consequence in that automatic
> deallocation of an allocatable array does not (or can
> not) occur.

Sounds like a bug to me, and if your test program worked
in a previous release, it's a regression.

Probably best to open a PR.

Best regards

	Thomas