From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 89807 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 17:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 89529 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2015 17:45:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mtaout002.msg.strl.va.charter.net Received: from mtaout002-public.msg.strl.va.charter.net (HELO mtaout002.msg.strl.va.charter.net) (68.114.190.27) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:45:16 +0000 Received: from impout005 ([68.114.189.20]) by mtaout002.msg.strl.va.charter.net (InterMail vM.9.00.020.01 201-2473-160) with ESMTP id <20151029174515.FCNT16519.mtaout002.msg.strl.va.charter.net@impout005>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:45:15 -0500 Received: from quattro.localdomain ([96.41.215.23]) by impout005 with charter.net id b5lD1r00A0Wrkg0015lDVR; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:45:15 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=NdNo1gz4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=salB9WdMPIDduBH7JsZfrA==:117 a=salB9WdMPIDduBH7JsZfrA==:17 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=vQVYZKsuOtRQ5Djspw0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Buvy4tqu4tQA:10 X-Auth-id: anZkZWxpc2xlQGNoYXJ0ZXIubmV0 Subject: Re: Development stage timeline? To: Paul Richard Thomas , Janne Blomqvist References: Cc: Damian Rouson , GNU GFortran , Jerry DeLisle From: Jerry DeLisle Message-ID: <56325B29.9000308@charter.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:45:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 On 10/28/2015 12:41 PM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: ... snip ... > I wonder if Jerry has made any progress with derived type IO? > Unfortunately no, however I happened to start looking at it some more today. Jerry