From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Received: from cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de
 [89.1.8.213])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79F88385841E;
 Mon,  3 Jan 2022 16:48:30 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 79F88385841E
Received: from cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de [89.1.8.203])
 by cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A87121B1;
 Mon,  3 Jan 2022 17:48:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:4dd7:eb03:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d]
 (2001-4dd7-eb03-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de
 [IPv6:2001:4dd7:eb03:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B5BF1209E;
 Mon,  3 Jan 2022 17:48:21 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [power-ieee128] libgfortran: -mabi=ieeelongdouble I/O
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
 "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
 Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>, Bill Schmidt
 <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
 David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
References: <20220103153621.GL2664@tucnak>
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Message-ID: <567fce05-484a-7cca-5ab9-7d3c17670921@netcologne.de>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:48:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20220103153621.GL2664@tucnak>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NetCologne-Spam: L
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0B5BF1209E
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 16:48:32 -0000


Hi Jakub,

> So, either we'd need to add e.g. preprocessing support for gfortran.map
> or some other way how to make certain symbols appear conditionally at
> different symbol versions, or another option would be to choose different
> symbol names for those for the powerpc64le-linux cases
> (e.g._gfortran_transfer_{real,complex}ieee128{,_write}).
> 
> Any preferences?

My personal preference would be the ieee128 variant, it would be cleaner
that way, but I have no strong opinion either way.

So, that variant is OK from my side, but maybe you could wait for
a day or so for anybody else to chime in.

Best regards

	Thomas