From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20DD3851C2E; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 17:58:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A20DD3851C2E Received: from webmail.free.fr (unknown [172.20.243.59]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBD1200385; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 19:58:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 2a01:e0a:8e0:4370:545e:5a91:f06c:3768 by webmail.free.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 19:58:33 +0200 From: dhumieres.dominique@free.fr To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Rui_Faustino_de_Sousa_=3Cjrfsousa=40gmail=2Ecom?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3EPaul_Richard_Thomas?= Cc: Paul Richard Thomas , gcc-patches , fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re:[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling In-Reply-To: <5f4f1316758e46a67181ad1d5951003e@free.fr> References: <0b58905bce20c64b46e9350aaecffe08@free.fr> <5f4f1316758e46a67181ad1d5951003e@free.fr> Message-ID: <59502d1619e891048bb29c987947525b@free.fr> X-Sender: dhumieres.dominique@free.fr User-Agent: Webmail Free/1.3.3 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 17:58:36 -0000 Hi José, > Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me provided the updated PR94331.c test file replaces the original one. Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be backported to at least GCC11 (applied and regtested OK). Thanks for the work, Dominique