From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.127]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90AB23854156 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 20:53:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 90AB23854156 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orange.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=orange.fr Received: from [192.168.1.17] ([86.215.174.255]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id UwcUozbn9OizNUwccop8KC; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 22:53:39 +0200 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.17] X-ME-Auth: bW9yaW4tbWlrYWVsQG9yYW5nZS5mcg== X-ME-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 22:53:39 +0200 X-ME-IP: 86.215.174.255 Message-ID: <6c49337b-0856-476e-7a34-bad707e68fa4@orange.fr> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 22:53:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.2 Subject: Re: Proxy ping [PATCH] PR fortran/100136 - ICE, regression, using flag -fcheck=pointer To: Harald Anlauf , fortran , gcc-patches References: Content-Language: fr From: Mikael Morin In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Le 04/09/2022 à 22:04, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit : > Dear all, > > said PR was addressed by Jose in > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055949.html > > but unfortunately his patch was never reviewed. > > IMHO the patch is mostly fine, with one small exception that > it should use POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (tmp)), see PR and > attached adjusted patch. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > Since this fixes a 11/12/13 regression on valid code, I'd like > to commit this one on these branches, but would be glad to see > an OK or LGTM from somebody else. (Jose says he's too busy > currently.) > LGTM. Thanks for taking care of José’s patches.