From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12227 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2019 16:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12205 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2019 16:05:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:8318af0, H*f:sk:8318af0 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:05:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9222030917AC; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-57.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.57]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6262217A70; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Stub implementation of unwinding for AMD GCN. To: Andrew Stubbs , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Fortran List References: <8318af05-5fc8-151d-ad21-7152e4f3e7b9@codesourcery.com> From: Jeff Law Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <7dbcd8cd-f2af-0665-fd5f-d3ea6f02bd49@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8318af05-5fc8-151d-ad21-7152e4f3e7b9@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-06/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 On 6/19/19 2:58 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > Ping. > > I can probably approve this myself, as it only affects GCN, but I'd > appreciate a second opinion. Similarly this is fine to self-approve. Thanks. Jeff