From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 89520 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2019 08:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 89499 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2019 08:58:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=wish X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:58:38 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:256) id 1hdWQP-0000Is-Dj from Andrew_Stubbs@mentor.com ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 01:58:37 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (137.202.0.90) by svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:58:33 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Stub implementation of unwinding for AMD GCN. From: Andrew Stubbs To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Fortran List References: Message-ID: <8318af05-5fc8-151d-ad21-7152e4f3e7b9@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-06/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2 Ping. I can probably approve this myself, as it only affects GCN, but I'd appreciate a second opinion. Thanks Andrew On 07/06/2019 15:40, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > This patch provides the "_Unwind_Backtrace" and "_Unwind_GetIPInfo" > symbols required to link programs using libgfortran. > > I do not wish to implement proper backtracing at this time (I have other > things to work on), and IIUC none of the existing implementations will > Just Work. > > OK to commit? >