From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02C3D3858D1E; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:38:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 02C3D3858D1E Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id j26so9516213wms.0; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:38:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=UyJCiKozGvxwPFUCrE8BiVhrKTnN5IsKT2/6Vl+fRrI=; b=WBfBcviRgq/iBXshv67HFszQQa4A3JN8iqcdxx7H9VH1GnKjNtPI4HkZlFAJjQDJfq /sV46+0gt0qYsMmmECVTHgO0r14dQGwzGLhRkUM9LgWiySEp6hJP3cS3Krv+LEhQ+79y pTBmgpUOHm5qcYvYXYoh6Ame06MDeCZsfekSLhrIr1htNcQLYyeTHiebSnFYfFVIHnYv Zllh+zGW04zQYmKfTg+ACOS4MaphH6eEp9LKQ6UX1wBHPEpnNRftr/SGdTVKlAtU2MWe k4JROKmkT+CoCVeh4okrEykFB4JAz3SxYXRQEqsN3tZ/0W/wKtWbiJKb/Iw6hiOxw331 K5rw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3enkTYhS37DHw8o/Zdq8gcFja04oRLS7bMCzWfwySm7RcQQiel Wn7g1IZtMGnl/WitjNBIB+4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5UBQgkYqyjI2dKH3+nHFHP5nuio7dj+MM77ppPw1X0Q32ZNS2/1S/QVJV6PWQ0rzpWu9Lr4A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1f1b:b0:3a5:f4f4:f599 with SMTP id bd27-20020a05600c1f1b00b003a5f4f4f599mr304651wmb.39.1662057509635; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a01:e34:ec28:8cb0:4043:c6cc:4e14:1048]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m9-20020a05600c4f4900b003a84375d0d1sm7010035wmq.44.2022.09.01.11.38.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\)) Subject: Re: Floating-point comparisons in the middle-end From: FX In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 20:38:28 +0200 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jakub Jelinek , FX via Fortran Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8F56F158-BAE2-45AC-80BB-55FB14DCE762@gmail.com> References: <8C6DDAA3-A40F-47C7-BE78-D56A3EC70C71@gmail.com> To: Joseph Myers X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 18:38:32 -0000 Hi Joseph, I have a Fortran patch ready to submit, but before I do so I=E2=80=99d = like to know: do you support or oppose a __builtin_iseqsig()? Jakub said he was against, but deferred to you on that. For me, it makes the Fortran front-end part slightly simpler, so if it = is decided to go that route I=E2=80=99ll propose a middle-end + C patch = first. But I do not need it absolutely. Thanks, FX=