From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Received: from cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de
 [89.1.8.211])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B322D385AC08;
 Sat,  8 Jan 2022 14:13:20 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B322D385AC08
Received: from cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de [89.1.8.201])
 by cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217F512778;
 Sat,  8 Jan 2022 15:13:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:4dd7:7488:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d]
 (2001-4dd7-7488-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de
 [IPv6:2001:4dd7:7488:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40CDD11F5E;
 Sat,  8 Jan 2022 15:13:10 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [power-ieee128] OPEN CONV
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>,
 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
 "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
 Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>, Bill Schmidt
 <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
 David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
References: <YdZ3b1n0h13M+tCV@toto.the-meissners.org>
 <c4996e62-4f2a-ad17-6fa9-29410166e91e@netcologne.de>
 <20220107092202.GE2646553@tucnak>
 <28f0a876-7281-936d-f727-cb7067c052f9@netcologne.de>
 <20220107195220.GP2646553@tucnak>
 <332da363-1c64-e1bf-a05a-d412c600f580@netcologne.de>
 <20220107214813.GR2646553@tucnak>
 <124cfb8a-e3d0-207c-8dcb-bdfab29372cb@netcologne.de>
 <20220108110038.GS2646553@tucnak> <20220108111056.GT2646553@tucnak>
 <20220108140258.GU2646553@tucnak>
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Message-ID: <8aff0c01-1715-aa06-5823-ed92567c1ea6@netcologne.de>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 15:13:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20220108140258.GU2646553@tucnak>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NetCologne-Spam: L
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 40CDD11F5E
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_MANYTO, NICE_REPLY_A,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 14:13:22 -0000


On 08.01.22 15:02, Jakub Jelinek via Fortran wrote:
> Note, as for byteswapping, apparently it wasn't ever working right fox
> the IBM extended real(kind=16) and complex(kind=16).

The lack of bug reports since the conversion feature was introduced in
2006, more than 15 years ago, tells us something, I guess...