From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toon@moene.org>
Received: from moene.org (84-86-97-173.fixed.kpn.net [84.86.97.173])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF077385802A;
 Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:50:08 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org AF077385802A
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=moene.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=moene.org
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by moene.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96)
 (envelope-from <toon@moene.org>) id 1oGn2k-003SWV-0w;
 Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:50:06 +0200
Message-ID: <8be6ef28-8e64-ebf0-43e7-5df85e7c4a57@moene.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:50:06 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] Fortran: fix invalid rank error in ASSOCIATED when
 rank is remapped [PR77652]
Content-Language: en-US
To: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>, fortran@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
References: <trinity-b07ff04e-affb-445c-b27a-14692575dbe0-1658434335166@3c-app-gmx-bs48>
 <8e300265-e24c-59c2-19b0-3d74fc5ed425@orange.fr>
 <trinity-c3b41188-1f8e-47c5-8b58-75c8cfa9bf9c-1658764864841@3c-app-gmx-bap61>
 <cc82482b-9735-ca48-6a2b-4f7c6a31de1b@orange.fr>
 <trinity-71255ca2-6b50-4e0b-92a3-2e81b5c0f029-1658780286309@3c-app-gmx-bs72>
 <2c940b18-08f2-adeb-6ac3-22e89b72440d@orange.fr>
 <aec53a51-4c11-d565-dc89-d6d63d3be0d8@gmx.de>
From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.org>
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
In-Reply-To: <aec53a51-4c11-d565-dc89-d6d63d3be0d8@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:50:10 -0000

On 7/27/22 21:45, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:

> Hi Mikael,

> Am 26.07.22 um 21:25 schrieb Mikael Morin:

>> Le 25/07/2022 à 22:18, Harald Anlauf a écrit :

>>> I would normally trust NAG more than Intel and Cray. 
>> … and yourself, it seems.  Too bad.
May I suggest that, if well known Fortran compilers differ in the 
treatment of this case, there might be reason to ask the Fortran 
Standard Committee for an Interpretation of the Standard ?

Kind regards,

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands