From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23FE13858D28; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 17:13:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 23FE13858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmx.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1674926017; bh=gx3gZt5OBUqspabWl4sYOKF0vNZdWLumss64jyhlRVQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=GunR+/BixJyGGAYgIIpid3rEHj9AxL20MfPwcds/cy83AtOuyuFu5oKklp/hPK+r4 fjAegxTIa0Am8+5Jp69k4jTStrkq2N1DpYsp0/2TAYFBd5LMeWRiVTxDECR5Rt+jdW sZsmHgRk9nP8qr9//zS6VnWMZK+lTnz4I8Ld3yDaU1jGYo94fRTAM3KUueSD6bXFbY CRS95KVAiQr2MVf9EbYAA1KxY1s/te5ZOinLbCvSYLe5O9mzgwv/S70M6T7r9jC4qV Xe+WPldWnRLqq6KMAL4WWW8UGYfMv05wfV3r+0KUUhsX4/bopFQps/1eAu1izCQ2ED GgXZvBbQQQWnw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from [192.168.178.29] ([93.207.92.92]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N1wll-1ofr6e1ro1-012L4h; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:13:37 +0100 Message-ID: <951878c0-f0e4-e23d-4053-d8590cd4ae96@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:13:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: *PING* [PATCH] Fortran: fix ICE in compare_bound_int [PR108527] To: fortran , gcc-patches Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.patches,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran References: Content-Language: en-US From: Harald Anlauf In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:j76tA/fr8qvzp5XMabFs7DoL8dFVl8zk9ZaoW51RU0iCIN++ip3 eJq/7FZ+SyDCr8iH7kUgFJg4S7YfbNSYSm86cp+6m+3B5ktnnGKQGiQe4LyzhNqr0wOIgz3 uSHpmmXR/78IYDGy8MmaVyTOW5I0X6dYXQsvwVLaIYBX8UqWTgKC54BQCn1+x+k6V/RmpFa 0SmTGeimUh4utC1dcxthg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:jSWTtFBBynA=;QeBEKgGxTgk0wrUXsr3/Xr3gx6v 1elMPeF9m/oyHMcp2qhlMm0yM/BScY6dlnQUfae6LDn+ZRcOWw2FqWEppomegXPQT1K2ys32o XQTOfhB57+TAt43Ive9QngubYKzm2T4XboVAca6ICZa6je75k2Wr1HjLM67jcDicOamO7lZNA 1RhARpnfxLhXy7Um8Tjw7J5djrPne10r58D4I0dzKnpazhiNEwXnQ/pRG0FwUW1TVkfU/+rAV WHOwbKsRLHLIWT6jezm0LR8Ww+Dy1YtdmsqFQlpZavudX1nfJYLS6GZrH4ddzh2u50+bq3x3z WwjjztQ9bgSHhmGWoORUeu3uSxR0wPeCt0YNIuaX62CGx3ESTtGjyVNiPAN7HBCqAvRMK5hvi T44zo/evczyHkbVa/PCMaUXwDqHQ+dxjtozX8o3PyxW5OAWG7E6PTFiJB1DVFHI378A9FVON2 IQR6U2UaP7r8fF/WxIgWQLotc0+Vn/FelBtmii7H3o2JHPIzvyuYv2pwQFVtUAwUYfmj0m1ra 5+2lOt1SzvCgEwClZ9X5cYUjGs5v7UQKwCpIN+D+JxvNrRcpvQqXzlPNA147pxrTP8FGr9dcS qUFB+mebGEjPOIzHrltJB+uXZOeja1/U2lj3ZTqW42FeFb83p28pO169BUmS/iEbUzYZcIhtv e0wNSJ0awuivqhDPI6enfVYBwqe9XikBuElGpMS7PIfS5kwYIGBmmCiqswQ9hxScmv9RVCWqH Ka/n4tNCWAr+6tvat8eCX2H3Q3DF6gpYqgj0mb/d+Uf3+sNhxFKVC82kBb/gvNaax48Z9VtE1 SQaudANkvpL7Z2hSz+ACmj1FDbTHLfoa9XQljP0cwBCbwoFsEp12JhPp6UddDMe5igHNxup0K 0KdV4uLMSObxvrCliQzNYQNCkkNPk9hdVRFYbl2iBnXXEpRCSNpUg5Lsp72EU0Re4HoRheWIF FZIekAyxgPhIvTJyiJMTA06BKw8= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Early gentle ping. Am 24.01.23 um 22:48 schrieb Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches: > Dear all, > > when checking expressions for array sections, we need to ensure > that these use only type INTEGER. However, it does not make sense > to generate an internal error when encountering wrong types, > but rather take the ordinary route of error recovery. > > The initial fix was provided by Steve. > > While working on the same PR, I found that the comments related > to the logic needed a minor adjustment, and the logic could be > cleaned up to actually match the intended comment. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? > > Thanks, > Harald >