From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 78194 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2018 11:32:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 78162 invoked by uid 89); 19 Apr 2018 11:32:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:U*tk X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients X-HELO: mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de (HELO mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de) (81.169.146.165) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:32:36 +0000 X-RZG-AUTH: :OGckYUunfvGNVUL0FlRnC4eRM+bOwx0+frxOSgq7RRSa88CpW+Py33LRnwi/fJ0WT7IiF5joJOpzgt2XmiGZ1BE9iJW8FA== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: PR85463 '[nvptx] "exit" in offloaded region doesn't terminate process' (was: [patch, libfortran, committed] Implement stop_numeric for minimal targets) From: =?utf-8?Q?Thomas_K=C3=B6nig?= In-Reply-To: <20180419091438.GX8577@tucnak> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:32:00 -0000 Cc: Thomas Schwinge , "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches , vries@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <95A48BB1-F36D-40DA-9665-1F670D3ECB2D@tkoenig.net> References: <751060e1-67cb-d290-4fd1-46b15b77fc1a@tkoenig.net> <87in8nsgz9.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> <20180419091438.GX8577@tucnak> To: Jakub Jelinek X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 > Mapping exit to abort is weird, For Fortran, this is mapping STOP with a numeric code to abort. The Fortran standard does not apply in this case. What does the OpenACC sta= ndard say about STOP in an offloaded region? Regards, Thomas