From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-30.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.30]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 069783858C54 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 20:55:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 069783858C54 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orange.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=orange.fr Received: from [192.168.1.17] ([86.215.174.255]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id a1Jyo6hkTJvOZa1JzoWRea; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 22:55:23 +0200 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.17] X-ME-Auth: bW9yaW4tbWlrYWVsQG9yYW5nZS5mcg== X-ME-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 22:55:23 +0200 X-ME-IP: 86.215.174.255 Message-ID: <9996bd59-9cf1-12df-faa5-7d546e5732f7@orange.fr> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 22:55:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] fortran: Support clobbering of variable subreferences [PR88364] Content-Language: fr, en-US To: Harald Anlauf , Thomas Koenig , Richard Biener Cc: Mikael Morin , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org References: <20220916202439.549820-1-mikael@gcc.gnu.org> <20220916202439.549820-10-mikael@gcc.gnu.org> <3edab734-f5bb-5557-ff98-b0ce47d7c510@orange.fr> <3ef8c5c4-35a1-fa60-2a2d-a7bb3fbd35fc@gmx.de> From: Mikael Morin In-Reply-To: <3ef8c5c4-35a1-fa60-2a2d-a7bb3fbd35fc@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Le 18/09/2022 à 20:32, Harald Anlauf a écrit : > > Assumed shape will be on the easy side, > while assumed size likely needs to be excluded for clobbering. > Isn’t it the converse that is true? Assumed shape can be non-contiguous so have to be excluded, but assumed size are contiguous, so valid candidates for clobbering. No? No way, really, arrays are going to be a maze of complexity.