From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 782473858401; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:47:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 782473858401 Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id z12so10189605wrs.9; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:47:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=l+QxZie8Vd9mkTcfCu0N41rNBPV+55+jBw4iSjXdEao=; b=vdx++eGQUWkgFv2ZOh5SyEAYdV6FdEXU01dyAP1T6cknicGR710tmJ5w4LAs0WsfbU kjvVn25coq2Rxejd8VEdu5LNC6B3i8WtJeHiiEVy7U5sGPM/wt2u/BLlQ6UYGxWerO9b IW8+UrK5YzBtMV2jDKZQQCr9Z0NF1AbWfFhWOTudUJKm3fgr/YXWYrItmnPJQgeowrzt IZmMDvmILDAjMdUZMo8AqPDc8o5FheanV5BOdR96EYVNZzs80N7QCvHb6iSmROgVo5qq ReRuYhn1qsRN6GzHEZPDDFkY1ZfxmBL9mKWUJith/bDTOZ1Z60egitEMDineZoxpUZ94 WXww== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2dZpQI2R7gbtEXJIpKnyhn1e2lLVw+lSCPHTzur7oDa+du7AnR n0MzUgnWXK/4QEMwdJ7B+yk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6hEq7JaG+U1l8JGNBllWxXqajlN768/7denXelxixxILPEZ+8wZz+ouAMsXFKFCZ3cWqGwyg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f80b:0:b0:21e:bb99:2438 with SMTP id s11-20020adff80b000000b0021ebb992438mr9429232wrp.665.1660592867333; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (lfbn-ren-1-637-46.w81-53.abo.wanadoo.fr. [81.53.21.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a16-20020a056000051000b00223b8168b15sm8114835wrf.66.2022.08.15.12.47.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] fortran: Expand ieee_arithmetic module's ieee_class inline [PR106579] From: FX In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 21:47:45 +0200 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Jakub Jelinek X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:47:50 -0000 Question to the Fortran maintainers: Do you know if the standard allows IEEE_CLASS and IEEE_VALUE to be used = as procedure pointers? I think not, because they do not follow (in = F2008) the standard constraint C729 / R740. If so, we need to keep these functions implementations in libgfortran = for now (for ABI compatibility) but can remove them at the next = breakage. Is one planned? Where is this tracked, is it still at = https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LibgfortranAbiCleanup or do we have another = place (e.g. in bugzilla)? Thanks, FX=