From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF31C3857C49;
 Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:24:21 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org AF31C3857C49
Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id
 o37-20020a05600c512500b0039c4ba4c64dso5880456wms.2; 
 Sat, 18 Jun 2022 12:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references
 :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=nt4+Kv1EVAFkq5UpBfOt4FJRi/LlIk8inSiwZeIKUHc=;
 b=g+/N9X+ir6oLcpXtVjWEzHTBhLBPzz64vjcnxiW5Nl7jkYS9ShT4moZ2JXKvHoM+Lo
 LdJIb3zS5sYybk2BG1GJLtyl6mGrdCESZtJImO6C96tBA8/Ui0WgQ/c9PukuwOqOYz4j
 eBcBL4FlVPlwG0c8BzP4g8js+cNAHEPH1+SzUnQTZbVOQaPjk0ZNuHcyRcxz97cNq6bX
 1JYraoC4B99LWRfZgvm6fyhFgMHU0hJHEmVNxBAGVIKTBTfJKucpiW40XrBHJRw5C0sI
 nStft7sxlt6zVnWEW3N012qYAkTNHc4jf7tvypYaPGeIYR/U5pXSV4DXIvfog1CplFHD
 CFXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+8MjqezloJIEnvPZK2Vyw+Jayu4JdzeeoCm3O/0AMqRFUvCMvP
 lc/z/lDitsVGibyvHrXGGr4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1s/rO3LtXkzv1Rv9kE4lFq6sMdTEswFvvWSWCjlvgVZVXWnH3RrgQYWcBrBdZYkixCTGABz9Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f95:b0:39c:7bd0:d47d with SMTP id
 n21-20020a05600c4f9500b0039c7bd0d47dmr16091543wmq.17.1655580260064; 
 Sat, 18 Jun 2022 12:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:::1? ([2001:871:227:33a8:ad28:acd8:19e8:d336])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 n26-20020a1c721a000000b0039482d95ab7sm9474804wmc.24.2022.06.18.12.24.19
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sat, 18 Jun 2022 12:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 21:24:15 +0200
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
CC: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>,
 Jonathan Wakely via Fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
 Wileam Yonatan Phan <wileamyp@outlook.com>,
 "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GSoC Blog Post 0 - GCCprefab build system
In-Reply-To: <YqzcQ7FDIgnqKPAZ@tucnak>
References: <BY5PR14MB391160D344B74F3D6A8D203BCEAB9@BY5PR14MB3911.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAH6eHdT=jSq-2zJ0gYqpXaVGNvuUF1Kvun4bWyodQ1PQN_d+hw@mail.gmail.com>
 <BY5PR14MB3911E24E418DDBC315A58EC3CEAB9@BY5PR14MB3911.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAH6eHdQ7tif+5-SaME5JC4ftaT5mLcMxvatj-_Bzoi91CZuXqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <DE7B363C-7C1D-4812-9E62-0C737183864E@gmail.com> <YqzcQ7FDIgnqKPAZ@tucnak>
Message-ID: <C0EC3007-EEF7-4197-B822-781DD9701501@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:24:23 -0000

On 17 June 2022 21:55:47 CEST, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat=2Ecom> wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:45:04PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gc=
c wrote:
>> PS: we should rm https://gcc=2Egnu=2Eorg/git/?p=3Dgcc=2Egit;a=3Dblob;f=
=3Dcontrib/gcc_build
>
>No=2E  gcc_build is used by maintainer-scripts/gcc_release, so by killing=
 it
>you'd make gcc unreleasable=2E

Doh, didn't grep in maintainer-scripts=2E
So, should the SVN parts be ripped out?

For non-maintainers, switch it to git instead?

>> It was not updated since the switch to git so, apparently, nobody uses =
it anymore (sadly, seeing who authored it)=2E

The hunks talking about subversion do seem to be misleading nowadays, aren=
't they?

thanks,