From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32459 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2018 14:09:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32440 invoked by uid 89); 15 Aug 2018 14:09:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=profit X-HELO: mail-io0-f196.google.com Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f196.google.com) (209.85.223.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:09:04 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-f196.google.com with SMTP id l7-v6so1078706ioj.1; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 07:09:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/VBm013nq4mUyD0mdigD+C7KdOkb44yqyuaqTP8moIc=; b=cYbfeWARwA7i3a2j/z2xHvJEQDeRnP1bkONMYq2I7dw1dLJ3XLBxnf8yS90z9ILKxt /MkJ2IaO06Z8j5Ap0yp9AaW9hQlB+QX02V4IaflCVVaVKyFeZOLcUhx3FQB9LEBBMKNn mGU97gXydALcey9FyF21sZBYqSDooQj68eQRjvOmgY7qwxYNqcDAHL55knJ3MPpEwbby MGffjubf7RDuYvqaWj9n9MyZAqgwQ3b/7xWWyYPfAxe5rQmib6LzKKUE4IkpkbYqEtdX dWHIM2s4G5oYa75lnticZ0VirKMAQgAJ0kU/uxyUimlLi/hlMlJVpe5th1QadBGyFYfG /0Hg== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9F1BA124-0E74-496E-9AAC-53C86052CF5F@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Fritz Reese Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 86935: Bad locus in ASSOCIATE statement To: Janus Weil Cc: fortran Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:41 PM Janus Weil wrote: > [...] > I think gcc would profit massively not only from having its primary > repository in git, but also having a proper review system > (github/gitlab give great examples, but there are lots of others by > now). Sending patches to mailing lists is so archaic and cumbersome. > > Just my opinion, though ... > I agree!