From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fortran-return-46670-listarch-fortran=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32521 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2016 10:32:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:fortran-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Post: <mailto:fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32475 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jul 2016 10:32:23 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f48.google.com
Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:32:12 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f65so22713627wmi.0;        Wed, 13 Jul 2016 03:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=mmCYo6WWB9UXmoKrpYYfybmhbaSq/t1ZK/MqanZjuHU=;        b=T2vgY9VwBfa+Fx0KAvj6DBXQFbHJDjALTuSu8e/j/sekfEA3fJwWYzpf04GP5YP5lj         PVMfkgAdvSleHvtVgaeyVlM+lQtFTOsu1oHQGjdR7CEP+nWdKodtX2gfQuqNM4eAiBnv         KikcU2AQ0JyE7owLEO58JASZQ0G/Eciw+k4KVWFDP1cyb7iPyUECKXKsPosM29jSDpb6         +/nC/xhYK/P2WZ+stN+jb3LrwHGo53MNjQyymTzRTTLhY0z/O/8HggGmehN5QuMKwWyp         CZe5iWVQJSJjk2tIh3e73jU3iJ9o+S5D6aX/VjTRgSwa6M9coX+6wpe8rCDY3jZk6nDE         eh6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL72PDGuygPuOkIdMQn+jwPXWgr+xPxGQ/oPiVFH8f2/2YhYGlgVx56fVNyqVklSvZiUbTAOM0B31a+Hw==
X-Received: by 10.194.62.110 with SMTP id x14mr178155wjr.77.1468405926750; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 03:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.147.203 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 03:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f4d7f51c-8e71-7ada-fb63-73934646006d@suse.cz>
References: <cover.1467883947.git.mliska@suse.cz> <86a3b430-0282-305b-8796-5a696d53b46a@suse.cz> <9b6e6e1f-b62c-7ea4-1f72-417472fa96e4@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc1sotqJVzpNaKiZ4azVsWxeouvZSRvMGXP98XStQrLDoA@mail.gmail.com> <e9345442-52c2-b0c3-7c25-4073b92fc027@suse.cz> <CAFiYyc3Vydg63j5m0DN+r1SRKT9+qPyqCdTnXKy3AyTXcyo42w@mail.gmail.com> <f4d7f51c-8e71-7ada-fb63-73934646006d@suse.cz>
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2oyJvzX-k2_qenHDNopRFd=4DQ8H7uyQ=RJ+pNt5Rbrg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortran DO loop fallback
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	"fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Martin Li=C5=A1ka <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
> On 07/12/2016 03:15 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> The scan for 1 *n_ after FRE looks still useful.  Btw, the testcase
>> doesn't fail for me,
>> we _do_ hoist the division in PRE, just not with -m32 anymore.  Can
>> you confirm this?
>
> Yeah, it works for both -m32 and -m64.
> This is final version of the patch, may I install it?

Changelog has a swapped entry.

Ok with fixing that.
Richard.

> Thanks,
> Martin