From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47979 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2018 14:20:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 47934 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2018 14:20:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,GARBLED_SUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:c0ed507, H*f:sk:4c9f65b, H*f:sk:oGjak1j, H*f:CAGkQGiKPgo81h6 X-HELO: mail-wr1-f49.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f49.google.com) (209.85.221.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:20:46 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 61-v6so9913782wrb.6; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 07:20:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YEsF/R587yWSS4NDYhqrjsIso81OP4Dh8zLt5DI95Eo=; b=Tb95JWCFl1Nhv9XuFO3g35eiAWLo3DjbgvzlEL/jhQryOi14loSFX14oKv50KG21ZY rbJbhMGAjjht9KWhG4ebdQDm/Xd8+bfDxPyQF+m1SVvRpflIOdCc1bKYqfs0OhnCkN0y 9yAdgesgR9Q1o+V1vAN++LkFJJDuf7vBi0rxin03/4c76Zd7S1TXMXz1Arp7aaCjL/Xi Chsg/61alB0J3ZG536wn8nSEZdChKxpsW4h/R0vHrqzBYQU/OAeYwhMYDNJaE+atRrOo SjxsMZBYhHBv5x5eP0yWVlYn8aIabwouOo1qgMdQMRjg1RWhWpS1QKNG/YrgK1hzmSuZ Q1NA== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4c9f65bf-4878-baa0-f3e5-d3943e4eb985@netcologne.de> In-Reply-To: From: David Edelsohn Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=5BPatch=2C_Fortran=5D_PR_fortran=2F83522_=E2=80=93_reject_arr?= =?UTF-8?Q?ay=2Dvalued_substrings?= To: Paul Richard Thomas Cc: Thomas Koenig , Fortran List , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 Another data point: I tried some of the testcases with IBM XL Fortran compiler and it didn't complain or fail. I have no idea if this behavior is an IBM extension or how other Fortran compilers behave. GNU Fortran probably should be compatible with other Fortran compilers, even if the behavior is not pedantically conformant with the standard. Thanks, David On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:12 PM Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > > This seems to have caused errors in the testsuite. I guess that the > problem is that the testcases are invalid :-( > > From David Edelsohn: > Error: Substring reference of nonscalar not permitted at (1) > > arrayio_11.f90 > arrayio_12.f90 > associate_23.f90 > data_char_1.f90 > deferred_character_2.f90 > deferred_character_22.f90 > deferred_character_23.f90 > deferred_character_8.f90 > deferred_type_component_3.f90 > > Cheers > > Paul > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > > > Hi Tobias, > > > > nice to hear from you again! > > > > > Build and regtested on x86_64-linux. > > > OK for the trunk? > > > > OK. Thanks for the patch! > > > > Regards > > > > Thomas > > > > -- > "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" > - Albert Einstein