Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/100551 - [11/12 Regression] Passing return value to class(*) dummy argument

[Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>]

Hi Harald,

I meant to deal with this myself since I am the guilty party. However, the
last two weeks have been taken up by a house move and so gfortran has been
on the backburner.

The patch looks good and seems to do the job - OK for master and 11-branch.

Thanks a million for dealing with it!

Paul

PS If I walk 200m I can now see the "dreaming spires" of Oxford! Better
still, there are no fewer than three very good pub/restaurants within
walking distance :-)


On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 23:22, Harald Anlauf via Fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
wrote:

> The fix for PR93924/5 has caused a regression for code such as given
> in the present PR.  This can be remedied by adjusting the check when
> to invoke the implicit conversion of actual argument to an unlimited
> polymorphic procedure argument.
>
> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> OK for mainline and backport to 11-branch?
>
> Thanks,
> Harald
>
>
> Fortran: fix passing return value to class(*) dummy argument
>
> gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
>
>         PR fortran/100551
>         * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Adjust check for
>         implicit conversion of actual argument to an unlimited polymorphic
>         procedure argument.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         PR fortran/100551
>         * gfortran.dg/pr100551.f90: New test.
>
>

-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" -
Albert Einstein